 | Securitization- This
novel financing method can be a major factor in rate
reductions. Our consultants developed a model that
evaluated securitization alternatives and addressed a
myriad of tax and procedural issues.
|
 | Review and Assessment of Capital
Additions not Currently in Ratebase - Our
consultants reviewed over $1.4 billion in capital
additions, including repowerings, nuclear modifications,
and regular plant additions, using both defined
regulatory standards and common analytical methods to
determine which additions should be included for stranded
cost recovery.
|
 | Cost of Service Study (COSS)
Assessment and Unbundling of Rates- Our
consultants reviewed the Company's COSS submittal and
then performed alternative model runs using methodologies
that more accurately met the BPU's established
guidelines. Our consultants, using the Cost of Service
Study, unbundled rates by functional area and class of
customers.
|
 | Market Price Forecast-
This key variable in the calculation of stranded cost was
developed using a comprehensive and proven model, ICF
Resources Integrated Planning Model (IPM). This linear
programming model determined optimal dispatch patterns
and choices of resource options to meet electricity
demand at the minimum cost. IPM addressed the entire PJM
region with additional inputs from ECAR, NYPP, and the
northeast.
|
 | O&M, Capital and Non-Utility
Generation Cost Mitigation - Knowledge of
historical O&M and capital costs is not enough to
properly calculate go-forward costs. Our consultants
developed mitigation estimates for all major cost areas
in order to develop post-mitigation stranded cost
estimates. The mitigation of NUG contracts is another key
issue with many utilities and Commissions. Our analysis
provided a perspective on options available, success
levels elsewhere, and incentives needed for success.
|
 | Stranded Cost Calculation This critical analysis and comparison of our
estimate of stranded costs and PSE&G's is a critical
element of the report. Many of our tax, capital addition,
market price, and energy and capacity estimates were part
of the $1 billion difference between our calculation and
the Company's.
|
 | Financial Analysis
This chapter was a culmination of our analysis. Our
consultants used a financial model that permitted
development of a series of rate reductions while keeping
ROEs and other financial measures at constant levels.
Ultimately, we were able to present a recommended rate
reduction that integrated all elements of our analysis.
|
 | FERC vs. Regulatory Book Audit and
Tax Issues - Our accountants, starting with the
last rate case in 1992, matched differences between FERC
and regulatory books. These were updated to 1995, for the
last cost of service study and then projected to 12/31/98
for calculating stranded costs at the time deregulation
started. Our consultants made key recommendations on how
complex tax issues such as deferred taxes and ITC
normalization should be addressed.
|
 | Restructuring Policy Issues- This report section addresses a broad range of
policy issues regarding the implementation of
competition. Specific areas addressed include: |